Participation Guidelines

The City of Flagstaff (the “City”) has partnered with Peak Democracy, a third-party online forum provider, to create a civic engagement platform that will allow the citizens of Flagstaff get more involved in City government. Flagstaff Community Forum is a forum for the discussion of proposed City projects and upcoming policy topics related to local government in the City and its partner agencies. The topics are generated by City staff, commissions, and Council for the purpose of public participation in current government decision making.

To ensure that all voices are heard and that forum participants are able to speak freely about the posted topics, participants who register to use the forum must agree to not post disruptive statements. Disruptive statements include the following:

Peak Democracy, acting as the forum monitor, will remove any disruptive statements that are posted on the forum. Forum participants who post disruptive statements may lose their posting privileges.

Frequently asked questions about the participation guidelines

Why does Peak Democracy monitor for disruptive statements?

Peak Democracy is a non-partisan company dedicated to building public trust in government and broadening civic engagement. Many people will not participate, if the forum has disruptive statements.

Does Peak Democracy find many disruptive statements?

No. Disruptive statements are quite rare - less than one in a thousand statements on Peak Democracy moderated topics nationwide are disruptive.

What does Peak Democracy do if they find a disruptive statement?

Peak Democracy

Does Peak Democracy ever edit or delete statements?

Never. Only the statement's author can edit or delete a statement. If a statement is removed from the public website, it will still be seen by the City of Flagstaff and be part of the public record.

If I disagree with someone, can I post my opinion?

Yes. Peak Democracy encourages open dialog and debate which, by necessity, includes disagreements.

How do I know if my statement is a 'disagreement' or a 'personal attack'?

Personal attacks are disparaging remarks which impute motives to a person's action. Statements of fact, or of your own opinion are generally not personal attacks.

Here are some examples of statements which are, and are not, personal attacks.

Personal Attack v. Not A Personal Attack

He is a liar. V. He said he did X, but in fact he did Y.

She misrepresented the truth. V. I don't believe what she said.

He is greedy. V. He is making money from this project.

It is merely a power play on her part. V. She will announce her candidacy soon.